1957 Ford 12 M vs. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi (180 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1957 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi should accelerate faster than 1957 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi weights approximately 615 kg more than 1957 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Ford 12 M | 2010 Suzuki Kizashi | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | 12 M | Kizashi |
Year Released | 1957 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4651 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1481 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2700 mm |