1957 Ford 12 M vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (548 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 511 more horse power than 1957 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1957 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 1014 kg more than 1957 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Ford 12 M | 2013 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Ford | Cadillac |
Model | 12 M | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1957 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 548 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1914 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1884 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1422 mm |