1957 Ford 17M vs. 1964 Holden EK
To start off, 1964 Holden EK is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford 17M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford 17M would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Holden EK (65 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1957 Ford 17M. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Holden EK should accelerate faster than 1957 Ford 17M.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EK (160 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Ford 17M. (129 Nm). This means 1964 Holden EK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Ford 17M.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Ford 17M | 1964 Holden EK | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | 17M | EK |
| Year Released | 1957 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1698 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 65 HP |
| Torque | 129 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1740 mm |
