1957 Ford 17M vs. 2002 Nissan Maxima
To start off, 2002 Nissan Maxima is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford 17M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford 17M would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Nissan Maxima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Nissan Maxima (252 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1957 Ford 17M. (59 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Maxima should accelerate faster than 1957 Ford 17M.
Because 1957 Ford 17M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Ford 17M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Maxima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Nissan Maxima (334 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Ford 17M. (129 Nm). This means 2002 Nissan Maxima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Ford 17M.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Ford 17M | 2002 Nissan Maxima | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | 17M | Maxima |
Year Released | 1957 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1698 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 129 Nm | 334 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2760 mm |