1957 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,112 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 212 kg more than 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Ford Thunderbird | 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Ford | Studebaker |
Model | Thunderbird | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 1957 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5112 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1512 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2980 mm |