1957 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,112 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Ford Thunderbird (223 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (62 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 678 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1957 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Ford Thunderbird | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | Thunderbird | R2 |
Year Released | 1957 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5112 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1512 kg | 834 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2370 mm |