1957 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,112 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Ford Thunderbird (223 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Clio weights approximately 298 kg more than 1957 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 1957 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Ford Thunderbird | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Thunderbird | Clio |
Year Released | 1957 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5112 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1512 kg | 1810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2580 mm |