1957 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2013 Volvo C30
To start off, 2013 Volvo C30 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,112 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo C30 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1957 Ford Thunderbird. (223 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1957 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 55 kg more than 2013 Volvo C30.
Because 1957 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Ford Thunderbird | 2013 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Thunderbird | C30 |
Year Released | 1957 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5112 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1512 kg | 1457 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4266 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2039 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1447 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2640 mm |