1957 Ford Zodiac vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1980 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 384 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1957 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Ford Zodiac | 1980 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Zodiac | Colt |
Year Released | 1957 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1194 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2310 mm |