1957 Ford Zodiac vs. 2004 Jaguar XK

To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1957 Ford Zodiac. (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1957 Ford Zodiac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 611 kg more than 1957 Ford Zodiac. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Ford Zodiac. (187 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Ford Zodiac.

Compare all specifications:

1957 Ford Zodiac 2004 Jaguar XK
Make Ford Jaguar
Model Zodiac XK
Year Released 1957 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2552 cc 4195 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 76 HP 294 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 187 Nm 411 Nm
Engine Bore Size 82.6 mm 86.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.5 mm 90 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1194 kg 1805 kg
Vehicle Length 4600 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1590 mm 1300 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2590 mm