1957 GAZ M-20 vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1968 ZAZ 966 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,120 cc (4 cylinders), 1957 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 GAZ M-20 (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1968 ZAZ 966. (38 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 GAZ M-20 should accelerate faster than 1968 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 GAZ M-20 weights approximately 686 kg more than 1968 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1957 GAZ M-20 (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 ZAZ 966. (72 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1957 GAZ M-20 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
1957 GAZ M-20 | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | GAZ | ZAZ |
Model | M-20 | 966 |
Year Released | 1957 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 2120 cc | 1196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 72 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 774 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2170 mm |