1957 GAZ M-20 vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,120 cc (4 cylinders), 1957 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (89 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1957 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma should accelerate faster than 1957 GAZ M-20.
Because 1957 GAZ M-20 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 GAZ M-20. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (176 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
1957 GAZ M-20 | 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma | |
Make | GAZ | Mitsubishi |
Model | M-20 | Carisma |
Year Released | 1957 | 1996 |
Engine Size | 2120 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1410 mm |