1957 GAZ M-20 vs. 2009 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,120 cc (4 cylinders), 1957 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (149 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1957 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1957 GAZ M-20.
Because 1957 GAZ M-20 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 GAZ M-20. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (220 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 GAZ M-20 | 2009 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | GAZ | Volkswagen |
| Model | M-20 | Polo |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2009 |
| Engine Size | 2120 cc | 1781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 1950 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1470 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2470 mm |
