1957 GAZ M-20 vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1957 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1957 GAZ M-20.
Because 1957 GAZ M-20 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 GAZ M-20. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
1957 GAZ M-20 | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | GAZ | Toyota |
Model | M-20 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1957 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 2120 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2601 mm |