1957 Holden FE vs. 1996 Renault Clio

To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Holden FE would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 190 more horse power than 1957 Holden FE. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1957 Holden FE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 670 kg more than 1957 Holden FE. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Holden FE. (150 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Holden FE.

Compare all specifications:

1957 Holden FE 1996 Renault Clio
Make Holden Renault
Model FE Clio
Year Released 1957 1996
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 2166 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 60 HP 250 HP
Torque 150 Nm 407 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 980 kg 1650 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 3780 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1640 mm
Vehicle Height 1560 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2670 mm 2490 mm