1957 Holden FE vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Holden FE would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1957 Holden FE. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1957 Holden FE.
Because 1957 Holden FE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Holden FE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Holden FE. (150 Nm @ 1200 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Holden FE.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Holden FE | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Holden | Ford |
Model | FE | E-350 |
Year Released | 1957 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2619 mm |