1957 Holden FE vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Holden FE would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 300 more horse power than 1957 Holden FE. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1957 Holden FE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Holden FE. (150 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Holden FE.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Holden FE | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Holden | Holden |
| Model | FE | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
