1957 Holden FE vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Holden FE would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Holden FE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1957 Holden FE. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1957 Holden FE.
Because 1957 Holden FE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Holden FE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1957 Holden FE (150 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 1957 Holden FE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Holden FE | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | FE | Micra |
Year Released | 1957 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2449 mm |