1957 Holden FJ vs. 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe
To start off, 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Holden FJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Holden FJ would be higher. At 2,150 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Holden FJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Holden FJ (59 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Holden FJ should accelerate faster than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Holden FJ weights approximately 280 kg more than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Holden FJ | 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe | |
| Make | Holden | MCC |
| Model | FJ | Smart & Pulse City Coupe |
| Year Released | 1957 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2150 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 53 HP |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 1820 mm |
