1957 Holden FJ vs. 2003 Volvo V50
To start off, 2003 Volvo V50 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Holden FJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Holden FJ would be higher. At 2,150 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Holden FJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo V50 (123 HP) has 64 more horse power than 1957 Holden FJ. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo V50 should accelerate faster than 1957 Holden FJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo V50 weights approximately 698 kg more than 1957 Holden FJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Holden FJ | 2003 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Holden | Volvo |
Model | FJ | V50 |
Year Released | 1957 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2150 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 123 HP |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1698 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2650 mm |