1957 Holden FJ vs. 2004 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2004 Smart ForTwo is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Holden FJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Holden FJ would be higher. At 2,150 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Holden FJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Holden FJ (59 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2004 Smart ForTwo. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Holden FJ should accelerate faster than 2004 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Holden FJ weights approximately 195 kg more than 2004 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Holden FJ | 2004 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Holden | Smart |
| Model | FJ | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2150 cc | 799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 1820 mm |
