1957 Holden FJ vs. 2004 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Holden FJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Holden FJ would be higher. At 2,150 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Holden FJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volkswagen Polo (100 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1957 Holden FJ. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1957 Holden FJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 105 kg more than 1957 Holden FJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Holden FJ | 2004 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Holden | Volkswagen |
| Model | FJ | Polo |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2150 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 100 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2470 mm |
