1957 Holden FJ vs. 2010 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Holden FJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Holden FJ would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu (169 HP) has 110 more horse power than 1957 Holden FJ. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1957 Holden FJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 559 kg more than 1957 Holden FJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Holden FJ | 2010 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | Holden | Chevrolet |
| Model | FJ | Malibu |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2150 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 169 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1559 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4872 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1786 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2852 mm |
