1957 Hudson Metropolitan vs. 1996 Mazda Midge

To start off, 1996 Mazda Midge is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Hudson Metropolitan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Hudson Metropolitan would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1957 Hudson Metropolitan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda Midge (67 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1957 Hudson Metropolitan. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1957 Hudson Metropolitan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Midge weights approximately 152 kg more than 1957 Hudson Metropolitan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1957 Hudson Metropolitan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Hudson Metropolitan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda Midge (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Hudson Metropolitan. (100 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 1996 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Hudson Metropolitan.

Compare all specifications: