1957 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2003 Suzuki Lapin
To start off, 2003 Suzuki Lapin is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1957 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Suzuki Lapin (62 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1957 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Suzuki Lapin should accelerate faster than 1957 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 210 kg more than 2003 Suzuki Lapin.
Because 1957 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Suzuki Lapin. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1957 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1957 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Suzuki Lapin. (106 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1957 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Suzuki Lapin.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Jeep CJ5 | 2003 Suzuki Lapin | |
| Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
| Model | CJ5 | Lapin |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2197 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2370 mm |
