1957 Maserati 250 vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Maserati 250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Maserati 250 would be higher. At 2,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1957 Maserati 250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Maserati 250 (193 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Maserati 250 should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Clio weights approximately 320 kg more than 1957 Maserati 250.
Because 1957 Maserati 250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Maserati 250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Maserati 250 | 2003 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Maserati | Renault |
| Model | 250 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2489 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 73 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 980 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2480 mm |
