1957 Mercedes-Benz 300D vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2000 Toyota Tundra is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Mercedes-Benz 300D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Mercedes-Benz 300D would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1957 Mercedes-Benz 300D. (158 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1957 Mercedes-Benz 300D. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Mercedes-Benz 300D weights approximately 210 kg more than 2000 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Mercedes-Benz 300D | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
| Model | 300D | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2994 cc | 3400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 3270 mm |
