1957 Mercedes-Benz 300D vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Mercedes-Benz 300D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Mercedes-Benz 300D would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1957 Mercedes-Benz 300D. (158 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1957 Mercedes-Benz 300D. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 374 kg more than 1957 Mercedes-Benz 300D. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Mercedes-Benz 300D | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
| Model | 300D | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2994 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 376 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 2304 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 5329 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1935 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 3220 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 100 L |
