1957 Renault Dauphine Gordini vs. 2010 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pixo is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Renault Dauphine Gordini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Renault Dauphine Gordini would be higher. At 996 cc (3 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Pixo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Pixo (68 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1957 Renault Dauphine Gordini. (36 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pixo should accelerate faster than 1957 Renault Dauphine Gordini.
Because 1957 Renault Dauphine Gordini is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Renault Dauphine Gordini. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Renault Dauphine Gordini | 2010 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Renault | Nissan |
| Model | Dauphine Gordini | Pixo |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 844 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 68 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2360 mm |
