1957 Renault Fregate vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2000 Toyota Tundra is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Renault Fregate. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Renault Fregate would be higher. At 4,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Tundra (242 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1957 Renault Fregate. (80 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1957 Renault Fregate. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 566 kg more than 1957 Renault Fregate. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Renault Fregate. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Renault Fregate | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Fregate | Tundra |
Year Released | 1957 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2141 cc | 4663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 242 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1384 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3270 mm |