1957 Seat 600 vs. 1980 Triumph Dolomite
To start off, 1980 Triumph Dolomite is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1980 Triumph Dolomite (57 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1957 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Triumph Dolomite should accelerate faster than 1957 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Triumph Dolomite weights approximately 365 kg more than 1957 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Triumph Dolomite (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1980 Triumph Dolomite will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Seat 600 | 1980 Triumph Dolomite | |
Make | Seat | Triumph |
Model | 600 | Dolomite |
Year Released | 1957 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 40 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2460 mm |