1957 Seat 600 vs. 2004 Volvo S80

To start off, 2004 Volvo S80 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S80 (268 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 249 more horse power than 1957 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 1957 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo S80 weights approximately 1082 kg more than 1957 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1957 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo S80 (380 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 340 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Seat 600.

Compare all specifications: