1957 Seat 600 vs. 2010 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2010 Dodge Dakota is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Dakota (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1957 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1957 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Dakota (236 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Seat 600 | 2010 Dodge Dakota | |
| Make | Seat | Dodge |
| Model | 600 | Dakota |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 40 Nm | 236 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 5560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3340 mm |
