1957 Seat 600 vs. 2011 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2011 Nissan Pixo is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Pixo (68 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1957 Seat 600. (19 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Pixo should accelerate faster than 1957 Seat 600.
Because 1957 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Seat 600 | 2011 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Seat | Nissan |
Model | 600 | Pixo |
Year Released | 1957 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2360 mm |