1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk vs. 1968 Volvo 120
To start off, 1968 Volvo 120 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,777 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 290 kg more than 1968 Volvo 120.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk | 1968 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Studebaker | Volvo |
| Model | Sky Hawk | 120 |
| Year Released | 1957 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2777 cc | 1777 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2610 mm |
