1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk vs. 2006 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,777 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 18 kg more than 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Because 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk | 2006 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Studebaker | Volkswagen |
| Model | Sky Hawk | Polo |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2777 cc | 1420 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 79 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1318 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2470 mm |
