1957 Talbot T 26 vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Talbot T 26 (198 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2004 Toyota Tundra. (187 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota Tundra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 110 kg more than 1957 Talbot T 26.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Talbot T 26. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Talbot T 26 | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Talbot | Toyota |
| Model | T 26 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 4482 cc | 3400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 198 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1920 mm |
