1957 Talbot T 26 vs. 2011 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-V is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Talbot T 26 (198 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2011 Honda CR-V. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 2011 Honda CR-V.
Because 1957 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1957 Talbot T 26 has manual transmission. 1957 Talbot T 26 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Talbot T 26 | 2011 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Talbot | Honda |
| Model | T 26 | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 4482 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 198 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4554 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1819 mm |
