1957 Toyota Master RR vs. 2004 Volvo S60
To start off, 2004 Volvo S60 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S60 (161 HP) has 121 more horse power than 1957 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1957 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo S60 weights approximately 332 kg more than 1957 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Toyota Master RR | 2004 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Master RR | S60 |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 2435 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 161 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1542 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2720 mm |
