1957 Toyota Master RR vs. 2012 Audi A3
To start off, 2012 Audi A3 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A3 (140 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1957 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1957 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Audi A3 weights approximately 295 kg more than 1957 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Toyota Master RR | 2012 Audi A3 | |
| Make | Toyota | Audi |
| Model | Master RR | A3 |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 2000 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 140 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1505 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1763 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2578 mm |
