1957 Toyota Super vs. 2004 Volvo S60
To start off, 2004 Volvo S60 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Toyota Super. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Toyota Super would be higher. At 2,524 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S60 (256 HP) has 216 more horse power than 1957 Toyota Super. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1957 Toyota Super.
Because 1957 Toyota Super is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Toyota Super. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Toyota Super | 2004 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Super | S60 |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 2524 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 256 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
