1957 Triumph TR3 vs. 1996 Honda CR-V

To start off, 1996 Honda CR-V is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Triumph TR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Triumph TR3 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Honda CR-V (128 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1957 Triumph TR3. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1957 Triumph TR3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Honda CR-V weights approximately 575 kg more than 1957 Triumph TR3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1957 Triumph TR3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Triumph TR3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1957 Triumph TR3 1996 Honda CR-V
Make Triumph Honda
Model TR3 CR-V
Year Released 1957 1996
Body Type Roadster SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1991 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 95 HP 128 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 925 kg 1500 kg
Vehicle Length 3840 mm 4560 mm
Vehicle Width 1400 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1280 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase Size 2240 mm 2620 mm