1958 AC 2-Litre vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC 2-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC 2-Litre would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1958 AC 2-Litre. (76 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1958 AC 2-Litre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 755 kg more than 1958 AC 2-Litre. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 AC 2-Litre | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | AC | Cadillac |
| Model | 2-Litre | 62 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 7028 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 79 L |
