1958 AC 2-Litre vs. 2012 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2012 Ford Ecosport is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC 2-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC 2-Litre would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC 2-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Ecosport (118 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1958 AC 2-Litre. (76 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1958 AC 2-Litre.
Because 1958 AC 2-Litre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 AC 2-Litre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Ecosport (170 Nm @ 1300 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC 2-Litre. (136 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Ford Ecosport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC 2-Litre.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC 2-Litre | 2012 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | 2-Litre | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1958 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |