1958 AC Ace vs. 1952 Allard K3
To start off, 1958 AC Ace is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K3 (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K3 should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K3 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard K3 (218 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 1952 Allard K3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 1952 Allard K3 | |
Make | AC | Allard |
Model | Ace | K3 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 218 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 59 L |