1958 AC Ace vs. 1952 Austin A 40
To start off, 1958 AC Ace is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 AC Ace (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 40 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1958 AC Ace.
Let's talk about torque, 1958 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (83 Nm). This means 1958 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 1952 Austin A 40 | |
Make | AC | Austin |
Model | Ace | A 40 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1952 |
Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 83 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2360 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 34 L |