1958 AC Ace vs. 1962 Austin A 99
To start off, 1962 Austin A 99 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin A 99 (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 99 weights approximately 640 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin A 99 (221 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 1962 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 1962 Austin A 99 | |
Make | AC | Austin |
Model | Ace | A 99 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 221 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 34 L |