1958 AC Ace vs. 1964 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1964 Toyota Corona is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Toyota Corona (83 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Toyota Corona should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Toyota Corona weights approximately 80 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1958 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Toyota Corona. (118 Nm). This means 1958 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Toyota Corona.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 1964 Toyota Corona | |
Make | AC | Toyota |
Model | Ace | Corona |
Year Released | 1958 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1453 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 118 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 61 L |