1958 AC Ace vs. 1965 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1965 Ford Mustang is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 269 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 1965 Ford Mustang | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Ace | Mustang |
Year Released | 1958 | 1965 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 4733 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 896 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2750 mm |