1958 AC Ace vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1966 Triumph 2000 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 AC Ace (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 274 kg more than 1958 AC Ace.
Let's talk about torque, 1958 AC Ace (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1958 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | AC | Triumph |
Model | Ace | 2000 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 896 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 64 L |